|
For other uses, see Anas (disambiguation).
| Anas | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) with brood of young, a typical member of this genus. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Scientific classification | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Species | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Some 40-50, but see text. |
Anas is a genus of dabbling ducks.It includes mallards, wigeons, teals, pintails and shovelers in a number of subgenera. Some authorities prefer to elevate the subgenera to genus rankCarboneras (1992). Indeed, as the moa-nalos are very close to this clade and may have evolved later than some of these lineages, it is rather the absence of a thorough review than lack of necessity that this genus is rather over-lumped.
Contents |
The phylogeny of this genus is one of the most confounded ones of all living birds. Research is hampered by the fact the radiation of the two major groups of Anas - the teals and mallard groups -; took place in a very short time and fairly recently, roughly in the mid-late Pleistocene. Furthermore, hybridization probably has long played a major role in Anas evolution, with within-subgenus hybrids regularly and between-subgenus hybrids not infrequently being fully fertileCarboneras (1992); see also Mariana Mallard.. The relationships between species are much obscured by this fact, and mtDNA sequence data is of dubious value in resolving their relationshipse.g. Kulikova et al. (2005); on the other hand, nuclear DNA sequences evolve too slowly to resolve the phylogeny of the subgenus Anas for example.
Some major clades can be discerned. For example, that the traditional subgenus Anas, the mallard group, forms a monophyletic (in the loose sense, i.e. non-holophyletic) group has never been seriously questioned by modern science and is as good as confirmed (but see below). On the other hand, the phylogeny of the teals is very confusing.
It is fairly clear by now that the dabbling duck lineages more distantly related to mallard group (which includes the type species of Anas) than the wigeons are should arguably be separated in their own genera. These would include the Baikal Teal, the Garganey, the spotted black-capped Punanetta group, and the shovelers and other blue-winged species. Whether the widgeons, which are very distinct in morphologyLivezey (1991) and behaviorJohnson et al. (2000), but much less so in mtDNA cytochrome b and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 sequencesJohnson & Sorenson (1999), should also be considered a distinct genus Mareca (including the Gadwall and Falcated Duck) is essentially the one remaining point of dispute as regards the question which taxa should remain in this genus and which ones should not.
The following arrangement is based on morphologicalLivezey (1991), molecularJohnson & Sorenson (1999), McCracken et al. (2001) and behavioralJohnson et al. (2000) characters and presents apparent major evolutionary groupings compared to the subgenera the species were placed in at one time or another.
The puzzling Baikal Teal (Anas formosa, male)
Probable genus N.N.
Probable genus Querquedula - Garganey (may include Punanetta)
Probable genus Punanetta
Red Shoveler, Anas platalea
Probable genus Spatula - blue-winged ducks/shovelers and allies (polyphyletic?)
Male American Wigeon, Anas americana
Possible genus Mareca - wigeons (may include Chaulelasmus and Eunetta)
Subgenus Chaulelasmus - Gadwall
Subgenus Eunetta - Falcated Duck
Subgenus Dafila - pintails
Male Northern Pintail, Anas acuta
Subgenus Nettion - teals (paraphyletic)
Green-winged Teal, Anas carolinensis
Subgenus Melananas - African Black Duck
Yellow-billed Duck, Anas undulata
Subgenus Anas - mallard and relatives (may include Melananas)
The last male Mariana Mallard, c.1980
Formerly placed in Anas:
A number of fossil species of Anas have been described. Their relationships are often undetermined:
Several prehistoric waterfowl supposedly part of the Anas assemblage are now placed elsewhere:
Highly problematic, albeit in a theoretical sense, is the placement of the moa-nalos. These are in all probability derived from a common ancestor of the Pacific Black Duck, the Laysan Duck, and the Mallard, and an unknown amount of other lineages. Phylogenetically, they may even form a clade within the traditional genus AnasSorenson (1999). However, as opposed to these species - which are well representative of dabbling ducks in general - the moa-nalos are the most radical departure from the anseriform bauplan known to science. This illustrates that in a truly evolutionary sense, a strictly phylogenetic taxonomy may be difficult to apply.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia